- Orchestral Study #1 (flowing and hymn-like)
- Orchestral Study #2 (driving and chaotic)
- Orchestral Study #3 (adagio with melisma)
- Orchestral Study #4 (allegro)
- Orchestral Study #5 (variations)
- Orchestral Study #6 (space)
- Orchestral Study #7 (dialogue)
- Orchestral Study #8 (toccata)
- Orchestral Study #9 (seven interludes)
- Orchestral Study #10 (rupture, slowed down and from different angles)
- Orchestral Study #11 (a crowd, disassembled)
- Orchestral Study #12 (thesis)
I say this every time, but this one felt like a failure early in and, except for the last section, still does. It’s because the muddy harmonies and overfull orchestration that I could never get right. It reminds me of a watercolor when you layer too many colors: a grayish, uncertain mess. This one also took the longest to complete because of my unhappiness throughout. Lesson learned?
The goal was a passacaglia-type work, but I think of it now as four variations without a theme. My intent always drifts as the ideas start to reveal themselves. The first section doesn’t have the clarity to come across as a thematic jumping off point, but it does set the harmonic structure for the three sections that follow. Second section: a chatty variation with runs swapped across the instruments. Third: long held notes in the horns while oboe, bassoon, and violas jump around noisily as background radiation. Fourth: the longest and the one that flowed out very naturally. A brash, more harmonically clear and confident statement split in the middle and the ending with a more uncertain theme using solo violin, viola, and cello.
Next up may be a sonorist piece. I’m using a classical orchestra just for simplicity (it’s enough of an effort to learn with just this limited palette) so I’m not sure how well that style will communicate.
orchestral-study-5